Whew. A poor fellow Lenin appears right through life tormented a question, what such the classes, to formulate an answer for which he was able only by the end of life in the «casual article about a locomotive». Naturally, he and wrote down him, where, only not to forget. As surprisingly, however, can be played off fantasy of Boris Yul'evicha.

Meantime Lenin understood long long ago, what classes and able to formulate this understanding. Differently, as in general he could become a marxist. It is an alphabet of marxism, perfectly known and to Lenin generally. Yet being a quite young man, just 24 years of age Lenin wrote «Economic maintenance of populism in-process»:

«Actions of «living personalities» within the limits of each to such social-economic structure, actions infinitely various and, seemed, uncomplying no systematization, were generalized and taken to the actions of groups of personalities, differentiating between itself on a role which they played in the system of production relations, on the terms of production, and track., on the terms of their vital situation, on those interests which was determined this situation, - in a word, to the actions of classes the fight of which determined development of society» (V.I. Lenin Soch. A publ. is fourth).

All determination of classes, as groups in the system of production relations it is already given here. Determination of classes can be found and in other works of Lenin and not only him, there would be a desire. And searching is not necessary. Cleanly logically clearly, that it is a not that question which could torment a great man right through life.

Article, from which Kagarlitskiy took leninist determination of classes the quite not «casual article about a locomotive», as there is Kagarlitskomu. It is the work going out a separate brochure known, large and important, with serious theoretical generalizations, in it Lenin exposes a difference between communist and capitalist labour, touches the questions of womanish labour and dying off of classes, and just about a locomotive in text of Lenin nothing is present. Work about which speech goes «Great initiative is named». Obviously, Kagarlitskiy does not know, about what writes and never the article of Lenin did not read, and did not even look over. About a locomotive and all here. Therefore, certainly, and determination of classes in this article on Kagarlitskomu is given not to the place. Although any, who will open the volume of Lenin with the indicated work, able to make sure, that determination of classes is there given very even in business. Lenin writes about the conquest of power a proletariat, about the subsequent dying off of classes and to rotin complication of way to this dying off he required once again to say about what class. And about a locomotive nothing is present there.

But Kagarlitskomu his ridiculous fantasy is so liked, that he repeats it once again already at the end of book:

«With this question Lenin was tormented. From here and obvious excitation with which he writes down suddenly lighting up him (and of indeed genius) formulation about the public division of labor, - in the most unsuitable place, in the article about repair of locomotive».

It is necessary so selflessly to invent such surprisings nonsenses. On my opinion, obviously, that after such trusting not a single word of Kagarlitskogo is impossible. No you, sir, intellectual not person, but same, that not on am the real quack.

In the book of Kagarlitskogo there is nothing about the origin of marxism, about his connection with all previous philosophical, scientific development of humanity, there is neither philosophy nor political economy, there are only raving, incoherent fantasies.